QTest, the Qt testing framework, provides a robust environment for unit and integration testing. While it offers various mechanisms for managing test execution, the ability to explicitly mark tests as "blocked" isn't a built-in feature. This means tests needing temporary disabling or those awaiting external dependencies lack a clear, built-in status. This guide explains strategies to achieve a similar effect, improving your testing workflow and reporting.
Understanding the Need for a "Blocked" Status
Before diving into solutions, let's clarify why a "blocked" status is beneficial:
-
Managing Dependent Tests: Sometimes tests rely on features not yet implemented or external services unavailable during testing. A "blocked" status clearly indicates why a test is skipped, unlike simply commenting it out, which loses valuable metadata.
-
Temporary Disabling: During development, bugs or unexpected behavior might temporarily break a test. Instead of deleting or commenting it, marking it as "blocked" allows you to easily re-enable it later.
-
Improved Reporting: Clear reporting is crucial for tracking test progress and identifying bottlenecks. A "blocked" status enhances reports by highlighting tests needing attention due to external factors.
-
Maintainability: Using a consistent approach to handle temporarily unavailable tests keeps your test suite organized and maintainable.
Implementing a "Blocked" Status using QTest
QTest doesn't have a direct "blocked" status. We can simulate this using several effective methods:
Method 1: Conditional Test Execution with QSKIP
This method uses the QSKIP macro provided by QTest. It allows you to conditionally skip a test based on a specific condition. This offers a close approximation of a "blocked" status.
#include <QtTest>
class MyTest : public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
private slots:
void testSomething() {
bool externalServiceAvailable = checkExternalService(); // Your check function
if (!externalServiceAvailable) {
QSKIP("External service unavailable");
}
// Your test assertions here...
}
bool checkExternalService() {
//Implementation to check the availability of the external service.
//Returns true if available, false otherwise. Replace with your logic.
return false; //Example: Service currently unavailable
}
};
QTEST_MAIN(MyTest)
#include "mytest.moc"
This code snippet skips testSomething() if checkExternalService() returns false. The reason for skipping is clearly stated in the report.
Method 2: Custom Test Result Reporting
This approach extends QTest's reporting mechanism to incorporate a custom status. It offers more granular control but requires more coding.
#include <QtTest>
class MyTest : public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
private slots:
void testSomething() {
bool conditionMet = false; // Replace with your condition
if (!conditionMet) {
//Simulate blocked status by adding a custom message to the test log
QCOMPARE(true, false); // This will fail the test and allow for a custom message in the report
qWarning() << "Test Blocked: Condition not met";
} else {
// Your test assertions here
QCOMPARE(1, 1);
}
}
};
QTEST_MAIN(MyTest)
#include "mytest.moc"
This uses qWarning() to log a "Blocked" message which will show in your test runner output along with the failed test. While not a true "blocked" status, it clearly flags the test's inactivity.
Method 3: Using a Test Framework Extension
For more sophisticated control, consider extending the QTest framework itself or using a third-party testing framework which provides a more robust mechanism for managing blocked tests. This method increases development complexity but enables tighter integration with a reporting system.
Choosing the Right Method
The best method depends on your project's complexity and reporting requirements.
-
For simple cases, Method 1 (Conditional Test Execution with
QSKIP) offers a straightforward and effective solution. -
Method 2 (Custom Test Result Reporting) provides more flexibility if you require detailed logging or integration with custom reporting tools.
-
Method 3 (Framework Extension) is best suited for large-scale projects with advanced testing needs.
Remember to thoroughly document your chosen method within your test suite to ensure maintainability and clarity for other developers. This ensures everyone understands the meaning and implications of a "blocked" test. Clear communication and well-structured code are crucial for productive testing.
